Email Subscription
Categories
10 Most Popular Posts
Search
Expert Pages
Monthly Archives
Recent Posts
|
|

Fantistics Analysts Twitter Updates
First Pitch - May 18, 2007 - Pitching Category Mashup (K/BB and QS%)
May 17, 2007 | article by in Fantasy Strategy (62)Research (48)
Pitching Category Mashup (K/BB and
QS%)
Good
morning everybody. For today's First
Pitch we are going to do something a little off the wall -- and perhaps mathematically
unsound - and mash together a couple of key pitching categories to come up with
a sort of uber-statistic for gauging starting pitchers. My premise is that we know Quality Start
Percentage (QS%) is a very useful indicator of a starting pitcher's worth. (Even though earned runs are to some degree
out of the pitcher's immediate control, I digress and admit its worth as a
measure.)Â In addition, I think that K/BB
ratio is one of the most important statistics for a pitcher. Past research
has shown that the higher the K/BB ratio, the lower the ERA and WHIP. So, why not combine these two together, and
see what falls out?
In order to
qualify, a pitcher needed at least 4 games started this season. The average (QS%) * (K/BB) for all pitchers that
qualified was 1.26. Here are the
pitchers that were more than 75% better
than average with regard to this new statistic so far this season. Stats are through games of 05/16/2007.
|
PLAYER
|
W
|
L
|
ERA
|
WHIP
|
QS%
|
K/BB
|
(QS%) * (K/BB)
|
|
Lilly, Ted   CHCÂ
|
3
|
2
|
2.53
|
0.900
|
0.88
|
6.0
|
5.25
|
|
Byrd, Paul   CLEÂ
|
3
|
1
|
3.49
|
1.241
|
0.67
|
7.7
|
5.11
|
|
Colon, Bartolo   ANA
|
4
|
0
|
3.66
|
1.062
|
0.80
|
6.3
|
5.00
|
|
Sabathia, C.C. Â Â CLEÂ
|
5
|
1
|
4.03
|
1.286
|
0.75
|
5.8
|
4.35
|
|
Shields, James   TBÂ
|
3
|
0
|
3.13
|
0.895
|
0.75
|
5.4
|
4.05
|
|
Peavy, Jake   SD Â
|
5
|
1
|
1.52
|
0.938
|
0.88
|
3.9
|
3.40
|
|
Hudson, Tim   ATLÂ
|
5
|
1
|
1.77
|
0.924
|
1.00
|
3.3
|
3.31
|
|
Bonderman, Jeremy   DETÂ
|
2
|
0
|
4.20
|
1.222
|
0.57
|
5.7
|
3.27
|
|
Johnson, Randy   ARIÂ
|
1
|
2
|
4.80
|
1.133
|
0.60
|
5.3
|
3.17
|
|
Halladay, Roy   TOR
|
4
|
2
|
4.37
|
1.162
|
0.75
|
4.2
|
3.17
|
|
Haren, Dan   OAK Â
|
3
|
2
|
1.64
|
0.961
|
0.89
|
3.4
|
3.05
|
|
Meche, Gil   KCÂ
|
3
|
1
|
1.91
|
1.190
|
0.89
|
2.9
|
2.61
|
|
Smoltz, John   ATLÂ
|
5
|
2
|
3.19
|
1.298
|
0.89
|
2.8
|
2.51
|
|
Beckett, Josh   BOSÂ
|
7
|
0
|
2.66
|
1.026
|
0.63
|
3.9
|
2.45
|
|
Lackey, John   ANAÂ
|
5
|
3
|
2.70
|
1.294
|
0.63
|
3.8
|
2.40
|
|
Schilling, Curt   BOS Â
|
4
|
1
|
3.64
|
1.250
|
0.63
|
3.7
|
2.33
|
|
Hamels, Cole   PHIÂ
|
5
|
1
|
3.46
|
1.317
|
0.63
|
3.7
|
2.30
|
|
Maddux, Greg   SDÂ
|
3
|
2
|
3.20
|
1.026
|
0.50
|
4.4
|
2.21
|
|
Snell, Ian   PITÂ
|
3
|
2
|
2.38
|
1.170
|
0.88
|
2.5
|
2.21
|
According
to our new measure, Ted Lilly is
clearly the best starting pitcher in baseball so far this season. There are some expected names here, like Sabathia, Peavy, Halladay, Smoltz, Schilling, etc. But also
notice that some lesser-heralded starters are having excellent starts backed up
by strong skills. These are guys like Byrd, Shields, Meche, and Snell.  The other thing to notice is that all the
pitchers on this list have elite-level K/BB ratios, so they should all be
considered good bets for continued success.
Here are
the pitchers that have been strictly
average (within +/- 15% of the average) with regard to this new statistic
so far this season.Â
|
PLAYER
|
W
|
L
|
ERA
|
WHIP
|
QS%
|
K/BB
|
(QS%) * (K/BB)
|
|
Silva, Carlos   MINÂ
|
2
|
3
|
3.00
|
1.381
|
0.71
|
2.0
|
1.43
|
|
Robertson, Nate   DETÂ
|
3
|
3
|
3.62
|
1.369
|
0.63
|
2.2
|
1.35
|
|
Perez, Oliver   NYMÂ
|
4
|
3
|
3.00
|
1.119
|
0.43
|
3.1
|
1.32
|
|
Danks, John   CHW Â
|
1
|
4
|
4.33
|
1.302
|
0.50
|
2.5
|
1.27
|
|
Maine, John   NYMÂ
|
5
|
1
|
2.15
|
1.252
|
0.75
|
1.7
|
1.25
|
|
Mitre, Sergio   FLAÂ
|
1
|
2
|
2.18
|
1.182
|
0.50
|
2.5
|
1.25
|
|
Tejeda, Robinson   TEXÂ
|
3
|
3
|
4.87
|
1.328
|
0.57
|
2.2
|
1.23
|
|
Marquis, Jason   CHCÂ
|
5
|
1
|
2.22
|
0.968
|
0.75
|
1.6
|
1.17
|
|
De La Rosa, Jorge   KCÂ
|
4
|
3
|
3.68
|
1.247
|
0.50
|
2.3
|
1.17
|
|
Ortiz, Ramon   MINÂ
|
3
|
4
|
4.89
|
1.261
|
0.63
|
1.8
|
1.13
|
|
Wakefield, Tim   BOSÂ
|
4
|
4
|
2.41
|
1.147
|
0.75
|
1.5
|
1.13
|
|
Carmona, Fausto   CLEÂ
|
4
|
1
|
3.12
|
1.240
|
0.83
|
1.3
|
1.11
|
|
Hirsh, Jason   COLÂ
|
2
|
4
|
3.99
|
1.329
|
0.63
|
1.8
|
1.11
|
|
Vazquez, Javier   CHWÂ
|
2
|
2
|
3.86
|
1.150
|
0.43
|
2.6
|
1.10
|
|
Kazmir, Scott   TB
|
2
|
2
|
3.96
|
1.380
|
0.50
|
2.2
|
1.10
|
|
Pettitte, Andy   NYYÂ
|
2
|
2
|
2.68
|
1.411
|
0.75
|
1.5
|
1.09
|
|
Garcia, Freddy An. Â Â PHI
|
1
|
2
|
5.17
|
1.500
|
0.33
|
3.3
|
1.08
|
|
Glavine, Tom   NYMÂ
|
4
|
1
|
3.31
|
1.215
|
0.67
|
1.6
|
1.07
|
|
Garland, Jon   CHWÂ
|
2
|
2
|
3.44
|
0.987
|
0.71
|
1.5
|
1.07
|
Now this
list is a little more interesting. Who
do we think is really good, but according to this measure is merely
average? Some of the names that jump out
at me are Vazquez, Kazmir, Pettitte, Garcia, Glavine, and Garland. In most of their cases they still have strong
K/BB ratios but are hurt by mediocre QS%.Â
Some of the trendier starters right now are John Maine and Fausto
Carmona, both of whom should inspire some caution due to sub-2.0 K/BB
ratios.
Here are
the pitchers that have been significantly worse
than average (75% or more) with regard to this new statistic so far this
season.Â
|
PLAYER
|
W
|
L
|
ERA
|
WHIP
|
QS%
|
K/BB
|
(QS%) * (K/BB)
|
|
Tavarez, Julian   BOSÂ
|
1
|
4
|
6.60
|
1.567
|
0.17
|
1.8
|
0.30
|
|
Igawa, Kei   NYY
|
2
|
1
|
7.63
|
1.598
|
0.20
|
1.5
|
0.30
|
|
Hensley, Clay   SD
|
1
|
3
|
7.62
|
2.047
|
0.33
|
0.9
|
0.29
|
|
Maholm, Paul   PITÂ
|
2
|
5
|
5.67
|
1.435
|
0.13
|
2.2
|
0.27
|
|
Redman, Mark   ATL
|
0
|
4
|
10.62
|
2.115
|
0.20
|
1.3
|
0.27
|
|
Armas, Tony   PITÂ
|
0
|
3
|
8.76
|
2.230
|
0.17
|
1.2
|
0.20
|
|
Ponson, Sidney   MIN
|
2
|
5
|
6.93
|
1.885
|
0.14
|
1.4
|
0.19
|
|
Chico, Matt   WAS Â
|
2
|
4
|
5.59
|
1.862
|
0.13
|
1.1
|
0.14
|
|
Loewen, Adam   BAL
|
2
|
0
|
3.56
|
1.747
|
0.17
|
0.8
|
0.14
|
|
Williams, Jerome   WASÂ
|
0
|
5
|
7.20
|
1.733
|
0.17
|
0.8
|
0.14
|
|
Pelfrey, Mike   NYM
|
0
|
5
|
6.53
|
1.747
|
0.17
|
0.8
|
0.13
|
|
Sanchez, Anibal   FLA
|
2
|
1
|
4.80
|
2.067
|
0.17
|
0.7
|
0.12
|
|
Ohka, Tomo   TORÂ
|
2
|
4
|
5.52
|
1.511
|
0.13
|
0.8
|
0.11
|
|
Patterson, John   WAS
|
1
|
5
|
7.47
|
1.947
|
0.14
|
0.7
|
0.10
|
|
Weaver, Jeff   SEA
|
0
|
6
|
14.32
|
2.591
|
0.00
|
1.7
|
0.00
|
|
Rasner, Darrell  NYYÂ
|
1
|
2
|
3.28
|
1.419
|
0.00
|
1.4
|
0.00
|
Hopefully
none of these guys is busy destroying your fantasy roster right now. (I personally swore off Jeff Weaver after last season...so I feel real good about that.) I know Loewen
is hurt now, but his 3.56 ERA was clearly not telling the true story of his
worth. Same goes for Rasner, who managed zero quality starts
but still managed a 3.28 ERA. The one
guy on this list that I would hold out any real hope for would be Paul Maholm due to his K/BB ratio. Otherwise, steer clear. Not only are their skills lacking, but they
don't have the ability to produce quality starts either, which means wins are
also very unlikely. Move along...nothing
to see here...
|