Email Subscription


Categories

10 Most Popular Posts

Search

Search this blog:

Expert Pages

Monthly Archives

Recent Posts

 

Fantistics Analysts Twitter Updates

The UMA draft strategy - Unappreciated Mound Aces

Anthony A. Perri

Recently I had a discussion with an industry colleague on the trend and effectiveness of passing on the top pitchers in this years draft, despite their discounted prices. I feel that this is a trend that needs to be addressed and possibly exploited.

This 2009 draft day sentiment likely stems from 2008, a season when 8 of the expected top 20 studs failed to finish the year in the top 30 (6 of 8 had significant injuries). In our continuing conversation, this individual went on to say that he's following the LIMA plan this year. For those who are not familiar with the BaseballHQ strategy, LIMA stands for Low Investment Mound Aces.  According to Wikipedia:

LIMA: A 5x5 Rotisserie strategy that proposes spending a maximum of $60 out of a $260 budget on pitching, spending a maximum of $30 on saves, ignoring all other pitching categories, and drafting pitchers who will pitch the fewest innings possible. The idea behind this is that if money is spent on the pitchers with the best skills, you will draft a team with a good ERA and WHIP, without "chasing" after fickle statistics such as wins. Pitchers should be targeted if they possess the following skills:

•Strikeout to walk (K/BB) ratio of 2.0 or greater

•Strikeouts per nine innings (K/9) of at least 6.0

•Allows fewer than 1.0 home run per nine innings pitched (HR/9)

Correct implementation of the LIMA plan will allow for the majority of a team's budget to go toward offensive players, whose statistics are relatively more easy to project. The LIMA plan is thought to be better suited for AL- or NL-only leagues, as opposed to mixed (AL and NL) leagues.

Let me start by saying that fellow colleague Ron Shandler is a respected pioneer in the industry and his strategies are always thoughtful and intuitive. The LIMA requisites (K/BB, K/9, HR/9) capture some of the valued universal indicators that we also use to project a pitcher's success. However I am not sold on drafting pitchers with the fewest possible innings, as I don't like to discount/punt any category especially when you consider that a pitcher's Strikeouts are one of the most predictable pitching categories. Wins are also above average in predictability. 

Regardless, this article is not about whether the LIMA strategy is viable or not, but rather how we can capitalize on the prevailing sentiment in this years fantasy draft room. 

Like many other strategies, the fantasy marketplace (the actual Draft) dictates whether a strategy will be effective or provide an edge. If everyone has or is applying the same strategy,  any edge that a strategy provides will diminish as the numeric advantage is dispersed among those applying it. This would hold true for our VAM strategy as well. If the rest of your league owners were ranking or valuing players based on both position scarcity with the probability of predictability among the positions, then the VAM strategy would lose it’s inherit advantage (which incidentally can be proven using our Mock Draft Simulator). Hence I totally respect and understand those who write me and say, “I love your service, but can’t recommend it to anyone in my league”.

Let's get to the point, this year TOP TIER PITCHERS are being discounted beyond reason.  It’s getting to the point where you can draft a top 5 pitcher for under or about $20 in a mixed 5x5 260 budget league. RIDICULOUS! Yes pitchers are more injury prone and offer less predictability, however they are being undervalued with “irrational  exuberance” this season.

Let's examine why and apply some simple Math to this quagmire:

1. Hitters are 46% more likely to come within 25% of their previous season totals. It's no surprise that pitchers are the most difficult position in fantasy to predict on a yearly basis. The chart below is based on averages over a three year period which shows that Starting Pitchers are 41% likely to come within 25% of their previous year's performance as measured by our Fantasy Points Indicator (FPI). 41 out of 100 come within 25% of last year's performance. Not very good when you consider that 60% (60 out of 100) of hitters (outside of catchers) come within 25% of their previous season production. Advantage hitters: In this case 60% to 41% or 1.46. Hitters are 46% more likely to come within 25% of their pervious season totals. This is a strong augment on why pitchers should be evaluated at a lower valuation than hitters, which bolsters the LIMA ideology.

2. Now consider this: A starting pitcher's contribution is worth 58% more than that of a hitter. Follow me here with the simple math: 14 hitters / 9 pitchers is the typical split in most league formats. 14 hitters for 5 rotisserie hitting categories, 9 pitchers for 5 Rotisserie hitting categories. Of those 9 pitchers, 6 are typically starting pitchers with 3 dedicated to the relief role. Closers typically log 1/3 the innings of a starter, so it would take 3 closers to contribute the same way as a starter in terms of Wins/WHIP/ERA/K.  So in total there are essentially 7 full role positions on the pitching side that contribute to 5 scoring categories. If we exclude Saves, we have 7 pitchers that contribute to 4 categories (4/7= .57), and 14 hitters that contribute to 5 categories (5/14 = .36).  .57/.36=1.58. Thus simple math show us that each pitcher's contribution is worth 58% more than that of a hitter.  This is an argument on why pitchers should be valued at a higher premium than hitters.

3.  Comparing point 1 vs. point 2: Well we can't really compare them on a level playing field, as the two percentages are not exactly tied together. All we are trying to do here is intuitively determine what a pitcher's relative value should be verses that of a hitter. To recap, Hitters are 46% more likely to come within 25% of their previous season totals (which means that they will be easier to predict and offer less risk). The Starting Pitcher's slot is 58% more valuable than that of the hitter (based on the limits of a league starting roster).

I am proposing that these are somewhat equal trade-offs. If this is a correct assumption, then one could make the argument that top tier pitchers should be valued at least as equally as top tier hitters, if anything the numbers lean towards pitchers being more valuable.

This week while on ESPN LIVE Auction Leagues I picked up Brandon Webb for $20, Dan Haren for $18, James Shields for $15, and Felix Hernandez for $16 (in one auction draft!)...Folks these are foreclosure prices and now is the time to invest.

It wasn't too long ago (ok maybe 10 years ago), when people were drafting Pedro Martinez at $50 and winning their league (does anyone remember Sports Weekly fantasy guru John Hunt successfully employing this strategy?) The game format hasn't changed, So how is it that pitchers are being discounted so greatly this season?!?  Obviously it's the forces of an open market determined by consumer sentiment. At the same time, we know that consumer sentiment in the market place and fundamental value are sometimes two completely different topics.  My favorite financial lesson in graduate school was learning about the Dutch Tulip trade of the early 18th century. A relatively worthless commodity trading at insane prices (and unfortunately we have just experienced example of this in our economy). In our fantasy universe, hitters are being overvalued at the expense of pitchers this season without fundamental justification....and it's my obligation as a fantasy advisor to bring this to your attention.

As our members know, we don't follow the herd here at Fantistics. Using our software and ranking system you'll see where the values are this season among the pitching corps, and you will be able to capitalize.  In a few days I will post some additional notes in the member draft area (join) on a recent strategy that I have been successfully employing.

T-15 Folks!

Have a great weekend,

Anthony A. Perri

Comments |

Recommend to a friend

  • Currently 2.99/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Rating: 3.0/5 (279 votes cast)


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.insiderbaseball.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1511.


Comments (0)

Post a comment


Recommend to a friend

Email this article to:
Your email address:

Message (optional):

*. The article could be sent to one person at a time

Please feel free to inquire about any of our products: info@fantistics.com


                                 Forgot your password?  

                             Privacy Policy     Links


 

Society for American Baseball Research

Subscribe

Sponsors

www.PartyPoker.com
 

 


Fantasy Baseball Software

Fantasy Baseball Y2k Player Projections!

Draft Day

Fantasy Baseball Daily Reports

Fantasy Baseball Strategy

Baseball Rookies Section

Fantasy Baseball Y2K Stats

 


Contact Us  ]
 

 


Welcome to Fantasy Baseball Fantistics

Copyright 1999-2012 Fantistic Technologies
All Rights Reserved.

MLB is a registered trademark of Major League Baseball.